Workflow boundary
One named exception workflow with start event, stop event, owner, reviewer and explicit out-of-scope actions.
BITEVO BUILD · FIVE-DAY DIAGNOSTIC · USD 3,000
Make one recurring HR exception reviewable in five business days.
BitEvo maps one Thailand/SEA recruiting, HR or workforce exception workflow and produces a human-approved review packet, bounded internal task readback and evidence handoff—without contacting candidates or changing ATS, HRIS, payroll, calendar or employment records.
Five-day scope
One workflow. Explicit fields. Human gate. Evidence.
The first phase starts before integration. We isolate the exception, make its review states explicit, and define what evidence would be required before any deeper system work is considered.
Field dictionary
Required, optional, conflicting and sensitive fields mapped from synthetic, redacted or schema-only inputs.
Exception rubric
Missing, conflicting, identity, policy, payroll-impact, duplicate and ambiguous cases mapped to review, hold or reject states.
Human-review packet
Every proposed internal effect has an explicit approval field, receipt/readback field and no-live-write boundary.
Evidence handoff
Workflow map, rubric, limitations, unresolved questions, acceptance result and next-decision queue.
Where it fits
For recurring workforce exceptions with a named owner.
Typical fits include multi-site hospitality, retail, healthcare, manufacturing, logistics, aviation, staffing, recruiting, RPO/BPO, technology, education and shared-services teams where one recurring packet, approval, site-readiness or handoff exception can be isolated safely.
GOOne recurring exception, one owner, one reviewer, safe inputs, no first-phase production write.
HOLDOwnership, data boundary or required system access is unclear.
NO-FITThe first phase requires candidate contact, employment decisions or production mutation.
Local synthetic proof
Measured locally. Not generalized to production.
The current proof is deliberately narrow: a fixed offline synthetic corpus and safety harness. It supports the diagnostic method, not claims about arbitrary customer data, production integrations, language quality, compliance, ROI or SLA.
12 / 12Fixed synthetic cases executed locally/offline
8 / 8Acceptance criteria passed
5 / 5Injected interruption / replay cases passed
12Red-team action classes blocked with zero real effects
Evidence boundary
The local proof also verified bounded readback, one-effect preservation across replay cases, corrupted-state rejection and sealed evidence bundles. It did not test ATS/HRIS/payroll connectors, customer systems, Thai/SEA language quality, legal/compliance treatment, production volume, latency, availability, vendor resilience or commercial outcomes.
What you receive
Decision-ready workflow evidence.
Workflow boundary statement, source-of-truth map, field dictionary, exception taxonomy, human-review packet template, acceptance rubric, safe proof plan, bounded internal-task readback specification, exclusion register, unresolved-question list and evidence handoff.
Explicitly excluded
No hidden production promise.
- Candidate or employee communications
- ATS, HRIS, payroll, calendar or employment-record changes
- Hiring, rejection, offer or eligibility decisions
- Identity / access provisioning, payments, signatures or account creation
- Production deployment, external API mutation, live migration or bulk correction
- Compliance certification, ROI, savings, headcount, accuracy, SLA or customer-outcome guarantees
Qualification first
Bring one exception workflow, not your whole HR stack.
A 20-minute qualification call is enough to confirm the workflow boundary, process owner, reviewer, safe inputs and no-live-write constraint. If the first phase fits, the five-day diagnostic is USD 3,000.